Sony FX2 vs Sony FX3: read noise comparison
Input-referred read noise at base ISO: Sony FX2 4.6 e⁻ (ISO 100), Sony FX3 14.4 e⁻ (ISO 80).
Dual gain: Sony FX2 ISO 400, Sony FX3 ISO 1600.
Sony FX2Twin
The Sony FX2 (ILME-FX2) was measured at 37 ISO settings from ISO 50 to ISO 204800. This model has no measurement of its own; the Sony a7 IV, which uses the same sensor, is shown.
At base ISO (100) read noise is 1.12 DN, or 4.6 electrons at the sensor. A second gain (dual gain) kicks in at ISO 400, cutting input-referred read noise by about 1.4 stop. From ISO 3200 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise. Settings above ISO 51200 don't change analog gain (digital push). Full well at base ISO is about 65,432 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 410.
Sony FX3Twin
The Sony FX3 (ILME-FX3) was measured at 41 ISO settings from ISO 40 to ISO 409600. This model has no measurement of its own; the Sony a7S III, which uses the same sensor, is shown.
At base ISO (80) read noise is 1.01 DN, or 14.4 electrons at the sensor. A second gain (dual gain) kicks in at ISO 1600, cutting input-referred read noise by about 3 stop. From ISO 4000 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise. Settings above ISO 102400 don't change analog gain (digital push). Full well at base ISO is about 227,834 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 1140.
Sony FX2 vs Sony FX3 read noise table
| ISO | Sony FX2 | Sony FX3 |
|---|---|---|
| 40 | – | 1.007 |
| 50 | 1.125 | 1.133 |
| 64 | 1.329 | 1.329 |
| 80 | 1.580 | 1.007 |
| 100 | 1.117 | 1.149 |
| 125 | 1.338 | 1.329 |
| 160 | 1.591 | 1.548 |
| 200 | 1.986 | 1.919 |
| 250 | 2.445 | 2.297 |
| 320 | 2.809 | 2.848 |
| 400 | 1.310 | 3.531 |
| 500 | 1.647 | 4.287 |
| 640 | 2.189 | 5.278 |
| 800 | 2.549 | 6.543 |
| 1000 | 3.160 | 8.000 |
| 1250 | 3.811 | 9.849 |
| 1600 | 5.098 | 1.591 |
| 2000 | 6.277 | 2.042 |
| 2500 | 7.945 | 2.445 |
| 3200 | 9.646 | 2.990 |
| 4000 | 11.959 | 3.249 |
| 5000 | 14.320 | 4.084 |
| 6400 | 19.027 | 4.857 |
| 8000 | 23.752 | 6.364 |
| 10000 | 29.857 | 7.781 |
| 12800 | 35.261 | 10.126 |
| 16000 | 44.942 | 12.042 |
| 20000 | 56.886 | 15.137 |
| 25600 | 68.594 | 19.160 |
| 32000 | 81.572 | 23.425 |
| 40000 | 103.968 | 28.840 |
| 51200 | 129.787 | 36.002 |
| 64000 | 127.116 | 47.177 |
| 80000 | 157.586 | 55.330 |
| 102400 | 191.341 | 69.551 |
| 128000 | 232.325 | 75.584 |
| 160000 | 292.036 | 93.054 |
| 204800 | 352.139 | 115.360 |
| 256000 | – | 142.025 |
| 320000 | – | 173.645 |
| 409600 | – | 212.306 |
Popular comparisons
- Sony a7 IV vs Nikon Z 6III
- Sony a7 IV vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Nikon Z 6III vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Sony a7 V vs Sony a7 IV
- Sony a7 IV vs Sony a7 III
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Sony a7 V vs Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Sony a7R V vs Nikon Z 8
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Sony a7R V
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Nikon Z 8
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Canon EOS R5
- Sony a7R V vs Sony a7R IV