Hasselblad H6D-50c vs Hasselblad X2D-100c: read noise comparison
Input-referred read noise at base ISO: Hasselblad H6D-50c 3.4 e⁻ (ISO 100), Hasselblad X2D-100c 2.8 e⁻ (ISO 64).
Hasselblad H6D-50c
The Hasselblad H6D-50c was measured at 7 ISO settings from ISO 100 to ISO 6400. Values are Bill Claff's (Photons to Photos) direct measurements from raw files.
At base ISO (100) read noise is 4.14 DN, or 3.4 electrons at the sensor. From ISO 800 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise. Settings above ISO 3200 don't change analog gain (digital push). Full well at base ISO is about 53,166 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 80.
Hasselblad X2D-100c
The Hasselblad X2D-100c was measured at 10 ISO settings from ISO 64 to ISO 25600. Values are Bill Claff's (Photons to Photos) direct measurements from raw files.
At base ISO (64) read noise is 3.97 DN, or 2.8 electrons at the sensor. From ISO 200 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise. Settings above ISO 12800 don't change analog gain (digital push). Full well at base ISO is about 34,682 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 50.
Hasselblad H6D-50c vs Hasselblad X2D-100c read noise table
| ISO | Hasselblad H6D-50c | Hasselblad X2D-100c |
|---|---|---|
| 64 | – | 3.972 |
| 100 | 4.141 | 6.233 |
| 200 | 6.453 | 5.464 |
| 400 | 11.081 | 10.629 |
| 800 | 19.973 | 20.535 |
| 1600 | 36.252 | 39.671 |
| 3200 | 67.182 | 78.793 |
| 6400 | 67.182 | 158.683 |
| 12800 | – | 312.996 |
| 25600 | – | 568.100 |
Popular comparisons
- Sony a7 IV vs Nikon Z 6III
- Sony a7 IV vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Nikon Z 6III vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Sony a7 V vs Sony a7 IV
- Sony a7 IV vs Sony a7 III
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Sony a7 V vs Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Sony a7R V vs Nikon Z 8
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Sony a7R V
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Nikon Z 8
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Canon EOS R5
- Sony a7R V vs Sony a7R IV