Sony ZV-E1 vs Sony ZV-E10 II: read noise comparison
Input-referred read noise at base ISO: Sony ZV-E1 14.4 e⁻ (ISO 80), Sony ZV-E10 II 3.8 e⁻ (ISO 100).
Dual gain: Sony ZV-E1 ISO 1600, Sony ZV-E10 II ISO 320.
Sony ZV-E1Twin
The Sony ZV-E1 was measured at 41 ISO settings from ISO 40 to ISO 409600. This model has no measurement of its own; the Sony a7S III, which uses the same sensor, is shown.
At base ISO (80) read noise is 1.01 DN, or 14.4 electrons at the sensor. A second gain (dual gain) kicks in at ISO 1600, cutting input-referred read noise by about 3 stop. From ISO 4000 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise. Settings above ISO 102400 don't change analog gain (digital push). Full well at base ISO is about 227,834 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 1140.
Sony ZV-E10 IITwin
The Sony ZV-E10 II was measured at 34 ISO settings from ISO 50 to ISO 102400. This model has no measurement of its own; the Sony a6700 (ES), which uses the same sensor, is shown.
At base ISO (100) read noise is 1.57 DN, or 3.8 electrons at the sensor. A second gain (dual gain) kicks in at ISO 320, cutting input-referred read noise by about 1.2 stop. From ISO 1600 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise. Settings above ISO 12800 don't change analog gain (digital push). Full well at base ISO is about 38,767 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 240.
Sony ZV-E1 vs Sony ZV-E10 II read noise table
| ISO | Sony ZV-E1 | Sony ZV-E10 II |
|---|---|---|
| 40 | 1.007 | – |
| 50 | 1.133 | 1.558 |
| 64 | 1.329 | 1.815 |
| 80 | 1.007 | 2.219 |
| 100 | 1.149 | 1.569 |
| 125 | 1.329 | 1.879 |
| 160 | 1.548 | 2.250 |
| 200 | 1.919 | 2.770 |
| 250 | 2.297 | 3.555 |
| 320 | 2.848 | 1.986 |
| 400 | 3.531 | 2.532 |
| 500 | 4.287 | 3.095 |
| 640 | 5.278 | 3.784 |
| 800 | 6.543 | 4.724 |
| 1000 | 8.000 | 5.856 |
| 1250 | 9.849 | 7.568 |
| 1600 | 1.591 | 9.000 |
| 2000 | 2.042 | 11.004 |
| 2500 | 2.445 | 13.929 |
| 3200 | 2.990 | 17.877 |
| 4000 | 3.249 | 22.316 |
| 5000 | 4.084 | 27.858 |
| 6400 | 4.857 | 33.359 |
| 8000 | 6.364 | 41.355 |
| 10000 | 7.781 | 51.984 |
| 12800 | 10.126 | 62.250 |
| 16000 | 12.042 | 55.330 |
| 20000 | 15.137 | 67.182 |
| 25600 | 19.160 | 81.008 |
| 32000 | 23.425 | 102.537 |
| 40000 | 28.840 | 120.259 |
| 51200 | 36.002 | 151.167 |
| 64000 | 47.177 | 190.019 |
| 80000 | 55.330 | 238.856 |
| 102400 | 69.551 | 298.172 |
| 128000 | 75.584 | – |
| 160000 | 93.054 | – |
| 204800 | 115.360 | – |
| 256000 | 142.025 | – |
| 320000 | 173.645 | – |
| 409600 | 212.306 | – |
Popular comparisons
- Sony a7 IV vs Nikon Z 6III
- Sony a7 IV vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Nikon Z 6III vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Sony a7 V vs Sony a7 IV
- Sony a7 IV vs Sony a7 III
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Sony a7 V vs Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Sony a7R V vs Nikon Z 8
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Sony a7R V
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Nikon Z 8
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Canon EOS R5
- Sony a7R V vs Sony a7R IV