Sony ZV-E1 vs Sony ZV-E10: read noise comparison
Input-referred read noise at base ISO: Sony ZV-E1 14.4 e⁻ (ISO 80), Sony ZV-E10 3.7 e⁻ (ISO 100).
Dual gain: Sony ZV-E1 ISO 1600, Sony ZV-E10 ISO 400.
Sony ZV-E1Twin
The Sony ZV-E1 was measured at 41 ISO settings from ISO 40 to ISO 409600. This model has no measurement of its own; the Sony a7S III, which uses the same sensor, is shown.
At base ISO (80) read noise is 1.01 DN, or 14.4 electrons at the sensor. A second gain (dual gain) kicks in at ISO 1600, cutting input-referred read noise by about 3 stop. From ISO 4000 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise. Settings above ISO 102400 don't change analog gain (digital push). Full well at base ISO is about 227,834 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 1140.
Sony ZV-E10
The Sony ZV-E10 was measured at 31 ISO settings from ISO 50 to ISO 51200. Values are Bill Claff's (Photons to Photos) direct measurements from raw files.
At base ISO (100) read noise is 1.49 DN, or 3.7 electrons at the sensor. A second gain (dual gain) kicks in at ISO 400, cutting input-referred read noise by about 1.3 stop. Read noise keeps falling across the measured range, so the camera isn't fully ISO-invariant there. Settings above ISO 32000 don't change analog gain (digital push). Full well at base ISO is about 39,672 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 250.
Sony ZV-E1 vs Sony ZV-E10 read noise table
| ISO | Sony ZV-E1 | Sony ZV-E10 |
|---|---|---|
| 40 | 1.007 | – |
| 50 | 1.133 | 1.495 |
| 64 | 1.329 | 1.753 |
| 80 | 1.007 | 2.158 |
| 100 | 1.149 | 1.495 |
| 125 | 1.329 | 1.778 |
| 160 | 1.548 | 2.144 |
| 200 | 1.919 | 2.639 |
| 250 | 2.297 | 3.227 |
| 320 | 2.848 | 4.028 |
| 400 | 3.531 | 2.129 |
| 500 | 4.287 | 2.657 |
| 640 | 5.278 | 3.340 |
| 800 | 6.543 | 4.000 |
| 1000 | 8.000 | 5.134 |
| 1250 | 9.849 | 6.277 |
| 1600 | 1.591 | 7.945 |
| 2000 | 2.042 | 9.714 |
| 2500 | 2.445 | 12.126 |
| 3200 | 2.990 | 14.929 |
| 4000 | 3.249 | 18.636 |
| 5000 | 4.084 | 23.264 |
| 6400 | 4.857 | 23.588 |
| 8000 | 6.364 | 30.065 |
| 10000 | 7.781 | 36.758 |
| 12800 | 10.126 | 45.570 |
| 16000 | 12.042 | 55.330 |
| 20000 | 15.137 | 70.522 |
| 25600 | 19.160 | 90.510 |
| 32000 | 23.425 | 88.035 |
| 40000 | 28.840 | 109.896 |
| 51200 | 36.002 | 133.436 |
| 64000 | 47.177 | – |
| 80000 | 55.330 | – |
| 102400 | 69.551 | – |
| 128000 | 75.584 | – |
| 160000 | 93.054 | – |
| 204800 | 115.360 | – |
| 256000 | 142.025 | – |
| 320000 | 173.645 | – |
| 409600 | 212.306 | – |
Popular comparisons
- Sony a7 IV vs Nikon Z 6III
- Sony a7 IV vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Nikon Z 6III vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Sony a7 V vs Sony a7 IV
- Sony a7 IV vs Sony a7 III
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Sony a7 V vs Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Sony a7R V vs Nikon Z 8
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Sony a7R V
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Nikon Z 8
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Canon EOS R5
- Sony a7R V vs Sony a7R IV