TREN
Samsung EX2F vs Samsung Galaxy S6 (IMX240): read noise comparison
Samsung EX2FDxO
The Samsung EX2F was measured at 7 ISO settings from ISO 80 to ISO 3200. Values were derived by Bill Claff from DxOMark lab data.
At base ISO (80) read noise is 1.48 DN. From ISO 100 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise.
Samsung Galaxy S6 (IMX240)
The Samsung Galaxy S6 (IMX240) was measured at 12 ISO settings from ISO 50 to ISO 800. Values are Bill Claff's (Photons to Photos) direct measurements from raw files.
At base ISO (50) read noise is 1.34 DN, or 6.1 electrons at the sensor. From ISO 250 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise. Full well at base ISO is about 4,650 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 230.
Samsung EX2F vs Samsung Galaxy S6 (IMX240) read noise table
| ISO | Samsung EX2F | Samsung Galaxy S6 (IMX240) |
|---|---|---|
| 50 | – | 1.338 |
| 80 | 1.485 | 1.659 |
| 100 | 1.729 | 1.932 |
| 125 | – | 2.603 |
| 160 | – | 3.182 |
| 200 | 3.249 | 3.681 |
| 250 | – | 4.408 |
| 320 | – | 5.502 |
| 400 | 6.190 | 6.543 |
| 500 | – | 7.781 |
| 640 | – | 9.918 |
| 800 | 11.876 | 12.042 |
| 1600 | 25.281 | – |
| 3200 | 54.948 | – |
Popular comparisons
- Sony a7 IV vs Nikon Z 6III
- Sony a7 IV vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Nikon Z 6III vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Sony a7 V vs Sony a7 IV
- Sony a7 IV vs Sony a7 III
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Sony a7 V vs Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Sony a7R V vs Nikon Z 8
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Sony a7R V
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Nikon Z 8
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Canon EOS R5
- Sony a7R V vs Sony a7R IV