Panasonic Lumix DC-S1 vs Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R: read noise comparison
Input-referred read noise at base ISO: Panasonic Lumix DC-S1 6.9 e⁻ (ISO 100), Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R 5.9 e⁻ (ISO 100).
Dual gain: Panasonic Lumix DC-S1 ISO 800, Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R ISO 800.
Panasonic Lumix DC-S1
The Panasonic Lumix DC-S1 was measured at 37 ISO settings from ISO 50 to ISO 204800. Values are Bill Claff's (Photons to Photos) direct measurements from raw files.
At base ISO (100) read noise is 1.14 DN, or 6.9 electrons at the sensor. A second gain (dual gain) kicks in at ISO 800, cutting input-referred read noise by about 1.7 stop. From ISO 4000 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise. Settings above ISO 51200 don't change analog gain (digital push). Full well at base ISO is about 95,590 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 600.
Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R
The Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R was measured at 31 ISO settings from ISO 50 to ISO 51200. Values are Bill Claff's (Photons to Photos) direct measurements from raw files.
At base ISO (100) read noise is 2.13 DN, or 5.9 electrons at the sensor. A second gain (dual gain) kicks in at ISO 800, cutting input-referred read noise by about 1.2 stop. From ISO 6400 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise. Settings above ISO 25600 don't change analog gain (digital push). Full well at base ISO is about 43,877 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 280.
Panasonic Lumix DC-S1 vs Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R read noise table
| ISO | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1 | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R |
|---|---|---|
| 50 | 0.637 | 1.602 |
| 64 | 0.818 | 1.647 |
| 80 | 0.883 | 2.000 |
| 100 | 1.141 | 2.129 |
| 125 | 1.347 | 2.789 |
| 160 | 1.625 | 3.227 |
| 200 | 1.972 | 4.199 |
| 250 | 2.282 | 5.618 |
| 320 | 2.888 | 6.821 |
| 400 | 3.458 | 8.225 |
| 500 | 4.257 | 9.918 |
| 640 | 5.169 | 12.210 |
| 800 | 1.945 | 6.635 |
| 1000 | 2.412 | 8.225 |
| 1250 | 2.969 | 10.267 |
| 1600 | 3.655 | 12.729 |
| 2000 | 4.563 | 15.348 |
| 2500 | 5.579 | 18.765 |
| 3200 | 6.916 | 23.425 |
| 4000 | 8.282 | 29.651 |
| 5000 | 10.196 | 37.792 |
| 6400 | 12.729 | 39.124 |
| 8000 | 15.889 | 49.180 |
| 10000 | 18.896 | 60.969 |
| 12800 | 23.752 | 76.639 |
| 16000 | 29.651 | 97.681 |
| 20000 | 38.586 | 123.640 |
| 25600 | 47.505 | 153.277 |
| 32000 | 59.302 | 190.019 |
| 40000 | 74.028 | 240.518 |
| 51200 | 91.773 | 294.067 |
| 64000 | 112.986 | – |
| 80000 | 143.013 | – |
| 102400 | 177.294 | – |
| 128000 | 218.275 | – |
| 160000 | 280.139 | – |
| 204800 | 347.291 | – |
Popular comparisons
- Sony a7 IV vs Nikon Z 6III
- Sony a7 IV vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Nikon Z 6III vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Sony a7 V vs Sony a7 IV
- Sony a7 IV vs Sony a7 III
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Sony a7 V vs Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Sony a7R V vs Nikon Z 8
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Sony a7R V
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Nikon Z 8
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Canon EOS R5
- Sony a7R V vs Sony a7R IV