Leica M11 vs Leica M11 MONOCHROM: read noise comparison
Input-referred read noise at base ISO: Leica M11 4 e⁻ (ISO 64), Leica M11 MONOCHROM 3.6 e⁻ (ISO 125).
Dual gain: Leica M11 ISO 200, Leica M11 MONOCHROM ISO 400.
Leica M11
The Leica M11 was measured at 30 ISO settings from ISO 64 to ISO 51200. Values are Bill Claff's (Photons to Photos) direct measurements from raw files.
At base ISO (64) read noise is 1.27 DN, or 4 electrons at the sensor. A second gain (dual gain) kicks in at ISO 200, cutting input-referred read noise by about 1 stop. From ISO 4000 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise. Full well at base ISO is about 47,875 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 200.
Leica M11 MONOCHROM
The Leica M11 MONOCHROM was measured at 33 ISO settings from ISO 125 to ISO 204800. Values are Bill Claff's (Photons to Photos) direct measurements from raw files.
At base ISO (125) read noise is 1.23 DN, or 3.6 electrons at the sensor. A second gain (dual gain) kicks in at ISO 400, cutting input-referred read noise by about 1.1 stop. From ISO 2500 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise. Settings above ISO 12800 don't change analog gain (digital push). Full well at base ISO is about 44,112 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 360.
Leica M11 vs Leica M11 MONOCHROM read noise table
| ISO | Leica M11 | Leica M11 MONOCHROM |
|---|---|---|
| 64 | 1.275 | – |
| 80 | 1.526 | – |
| 100 | 1.828 | – |
| 125 | 2.144 | 1.231 |
| 160 | 2.462 | 1.485 |
| 200 | 1.548 | 1.790 |
| 250 | 1.828 | 2.158 |
| 320 | 2.219 | 2.621 |
| 400 | 2.770 | 1.485 |
| 500 | 3.249 | 1.815 |
| 640 | 4.000 | 2.219 |
| 800 | 4.993 | 2.713 |
| 1000 | 5.856 | 3.294 |
| 1250 | 7.013 | 4.056 |
| 1600 | 8.634 | 4.993 |
| 2000 | 10.629 | 6.190 |
| 2500 | 12.817 | 7.568 |
| 3200 | 16.223 | 9.383 |
| 4000 | 19.698 | 11.632 |
| 5000 | 23.588 | 14.221 |
| 6400 | 29.651 | 17.630 |
| 8000 | 36.758 | 21.857 |
| 10000 | 44.324 | 26.538 |
| 12800 | 56.493 | 32.672 |
| 16000 | 69.071 | 40.504 |
| 20000 | 85.627 | 50.914 |
| 25600 | 113.772 | 64.893 |
| 32000 | 136.239 | 79.893 |
| 40000 | 168.897 | 99.044 |
| 51200 | 221.322 | 128.890 |
| 64000 | – | 158.683 |
| 80000 | – | 195.361 |
| 102400 | – | 252.476 |
| 128000 | – | 306.555 |
| 160000 | – | 374.806 |
| 204800 | – | 471.136 |
Popular comparisons
- Sony a7 IV vs Nikon Z 6III
- Sony a7 IV vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Nikon Z 6III vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Sony a7 V vs Sony a7 IV
- Sony a7 IV vs Sony a7 III
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Sony a7 V vs Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Sony a7R V vs Nikon Z 8
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Sony a7R V
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Nikon Z 8
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Canon EOS R5
- Sony a7R V vs Sony a7R IV