Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M10: read noise comparison
Leica M-E Typ 220DxO
The Leica M-E Typ 220 was measured at 6 ISO settings from ISO 80 to ISO 2500. Values were derived by Bill Claff from DxOMark lab data.
At base ISO (80) read noise is 8.17 DN. From ISO 400 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise.
Leica M10
The Leica M10 was measured at 26 ISO settings from ISO 100 to ISO 51200. Values are Bill Claff's (Photons to Photos) direct measurements from raw files.
At base ISO (100) read noise is 1.99 DN, or 5 electrons at the sensor. From ISO 640 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise. Settings above ISO 20000 don't change analog gain (digital push). Full well at base ISO is about 41,004 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 500.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M10 read noise table
| ISO | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Leica M10 |
|---|---|---|
| 80 | 8.168 | – |
| 100 | – | 1.986 |
| 200 | 10.928 | 2.445 |
| 250 | – | 2.514 |
| 320 | – | 2.848 |
| 400 | 16.912 | 3.272 |
| 500 | – | 4.112 |
| 640 | – | 4.925 |
| 800 | 35.017 | 6.105 |
| 1000 | – | 7.727 |
| 1250 | – | 9.190 |
| 1600 | 89.884 | 11.392 |
| 2000 | – | 13.833 |
| 2500 | 147.033 | 17.509 |
| 3200 | – | 22.316 |
| 4000 | – | 26.723 |
| 5000 | – | 33.591 |
| 6400 | – | 42.814 |
| 8000 | – | 52.346 |
| 10000 | – | 71.012 |
| 12800 | – | 88.647 |
| 16000 | – | 109.896 |
| 20000 | – | 132.514 |
| 25600 | – | 198.088 |
| 32000 | – | 238.856 |
| 40000 | – | 306.555 |
| 51200 | – | 367.093 |
Popular comparisons
- Sony a7 IV vs Nikon Z 6III
- Sony a7 IV vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Nikon Z 6III vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Sony a7 V vs Sony a7 IV
- Sony a7 IV vs Sony a7 III
- Canon EOS R6 Mark III vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Sony a7 V vs Canon EOS R6 Mark III
- Sony a7R V vs Nikon Z 8
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Sony a7R V
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Nikon Z 8
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Canon EOS R5
- Sony a7R V vs Sony a7R IV