alpereninyeri
TREN

Hasselblad X2D-100c vs Hasselblad X2D II-100c: read noise comparison

Input-referred read noise at base ISO: Hasselblad X2D-100c 2.8 e⁻ (ISO 64), Hasselblad X2D II-100c 3.8 e⁻ (ISO 50).

Dual gain: Hasselblad X2D-100c none, Hasselblad X2D II-100c ISO 200.

Hasselblad X2D-100c

The Hasselblad X2D-100c was measured at 10 ISO settings from ISO 64 to ISO 25600. Values are Bill Claff's (Photons to Photos) direct measurements from raw files.

At base ISO (64) read noise is 3.97 DN, or 2.8 electrons at the sensor. From ISO 200 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise. Settings above ISO 12800 don't change analog gain (digital push). Full well at base ISO is about 34,682 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 50.

Hasselblad X2D II-100c

The Hasselblad X2D II-100c was measured at 10 ISO settings from ISO 50 to ISO 25600. Values are Bill Claff's (Photons to Photos) direct measurements from raw files.

At base ISO (50) read noise is 4.17 DN, or 3.8 electrons at the sensor. A second gain (dual gain) kicks in at ISO 200, cutting input-referred read noise by about 1.5 stop. From ISO 3200 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise. Settings above ISO 6400 don't change analog gain (digital push). Full well at base ISO is about 55,739 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 50.

Hasselblad X2D-100c vs Hasselblad X2D II-100c read noise table

ISOHasselblad X2D-100cHasselblad X2D II-100c
50–4.170
643.972–
1006.2338.112
2005.4645.696
40010.62911.004
80020.53520.535
160039.67142.518
320078.79382.139
6400158.683140.070
12800312.996149.086
25600568.100146.018

Popular comparisons

All cameras · Open the full tool

Alperen Kılıç · Read Noise

Data: Photons to Photos · © William J. Claff