alpereninyeri
TREN

Hasselblad X1D-50c vs Hasselblad X2D II-100c: read noise comparison

Input-referred read noise at base ISO: Hasselblad X1D-50c 3.4 e⁻ (ISO 100), Hasselblad X2D II-100c 3.8 e⁻ (ISO 50).

Dual gain: Hasselblad X1D-50c none, Hasselblad X2D II-100c ISO 200.

Hasselblad X1D-50c

The Hasselblad X1D-50c was measured at 9 ISO settings from ISO 100 to ISO 25600. Values are Bill Claff's (Photons to Photos) direct measurements from raw files.

At base ISO (100) read noise is 4.17 DN, or 3.4 electrons at the sensor. From ISO 800 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise. Settings above ISO 3200 don't change analog gain (digital push). Full well at base ISO is about 52,743 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 80.

Hasselblad X2D II-100c

The Hasselblad X2D II-100c was measured at 10 ISO settings from ISO 50 to ISO 25600. Values are Bill Claff's (Photons to Photos) direct measurements from raw files.

At base ISO (50) read noise is 4.17 DN, or 3.8 electrons at the sensor. A second gain (dual gain) kicks in at ISO 200, cutting input-referred read noise by about 1.5 stop. From ISO 3200 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise. Settings above ISO 6400 don't change analog gain (digital push). Full well at base ISO is about 55,739 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 50.

Hasselblad X1D-50c vs Hasselblad X2D II-100c read noise table

ISOHasselblad X1D-50cHasselblad X2D II-100c
50–4.170
1004.1708.112
2006.2335.696
40011.00411.004
80019.83520.535
160036.75842.518
320068.12082.139
640069.551140.070
1280068.120149.086
2560069.551146.018

Popular comparisons

All cameras · Open the full tool

Alperen Kılıç · Read Noise

Data: Photons to Photos · © William J. Claff