alpereninyeri
TREN

Hasselblad H6D-100c vs Hasselblad X2D II-100c: read noise comparison

Input-referred read noise at base ISO: Hasselblad H6D-100c 2.2 e⁻ (ISO 64), Hasselblad X2D II-100c 3.8 e⁻ (ISO 50).

Dual gain: Hasselblad H6D-100c none, Hasselblad X2D II-100c ISO 200.

Hasselblad H6D-100c

The Hasselblad H6D-100c was measured at 9 ISO settings from ISO 64 to ISO 12800. Values are Bill Claff's (Photons to Photos) direct measurements from raw files.

At base ISO (64) read noise is 3.07 DN, or 2.2 electrons at the sensor. From ISO 400 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise. Settings above ISO 3200 don't change analog gain (digital push). Full well at base ISO is about 45,957 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 40.

Hasselblad X2D II-100c

The Hasselblad X2D II-100c was measured at 10 ISO settings from ISO 50 to ISO 25600. Values are Bill Claff's (Photons to Photos) direct measurements from raw files.

At base ISO (50) read noise is 4.17 DN, or 3.8 electrons at the sensor. A second gain (dual gain) kicks in at ISO 200, cutting input-referred read noise by about 1.5 stop. From ISO 3200 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise. Settings above ISO 6400 don't change analog gain (digital push). Full well at base ISO is about 55,739 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 50.

Hasselblad H6D-100c vs Hasselblad X2D II-100c read noise table

ISOHasselblad H6D-100cHasselblad X2D II-100c
50–4.170
643.074–
1005.1698.112
2007.6745.696
40014.12311.004
80026.17320.535
160048.84042.518
320095.01082.139
6400155.417140.070
12800272.479149.086
25600–146.018

Popular comparisons

All cameras · Open the full tool

Alperen Kılıç · Read Noise

Data: Photons to Photos · © William J. Claff