alpereninyeri
TREN

FujiFilm X-S10 vs FujiFilm X-T1: read noise comparison

Input-referred read noise at base ISO: FujiFilm X-S10 3.8 e⁻ (ISO 160), FujiFilm X-T1 3.8 e⁻ (ISO 200).

Dual gain: FujiFilm X-S10 ISO 500, FujiFilm X-T1 none.

FujiFilm X-S10

The FujiFilm X-S10 was measured at 25 ISO settings from ISO 80 to ISO 51200. Values are Bill Claff's (Photons to Photos) direct measurements from raw files.

At base ISO (160) read noise is 1.97 DN, or 3.8 electrons at the sensor. A second gain (dual gain) kicks in at ISO 500, cutting input-referred read noise by about 1.1 stop. From ISO 2000 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise. Settings above ISO 12800 don't change analog gain (digital push). Full well at base ISO is about 29,632 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 310.

FujiFilm X-T1

The FujiFilm X-T1 was measured at 16 ISO settings from ISO 200 to ISO 6400. Values are Bill Claff's (Photons to Photos) direct measurements from raw files.

At base ISO (200) read noise is 1.88 DN, or 3.8 electrons at the sensor. From ISO 320 up the camera is effectively ISO-invariant: raising ISO further doesn't meaningfully lower shadow noise. Settings above ISO 1600 don't change analog gain (digital push). Full well at base ISO is about 31,158 electrons; unity gain is around ISO 410.

FujiFilm X-S10 vs FujiFilm X-T1 read noise table

ISOFujiFilm X-S10FujiFilm X-T1
802.042–
1002.428–
1252.908–
1601.972–
2002.4121.879
2502.8682.250
3203.6302.732
4004.4083.364
5002.6034.000
6403.1385.063
8003.9186.320
10004.8577.568
12505.8569.448
16007.62111.876
20009.25413.177
250011.47212.906
320014.02613.177
400017.03013.086
500019.97313.177
640025.63413.086
800032.000–
1000039.671–
1280050.914–
2560080.449–
5120082.711–

Popular comparisons

All cameras · Open the full tool

Alperen Kılıç · Read Noise

Data: Photons to Photos · © William J. Claff